Tagged with " seo"
A phrase often uttered where online marketing is discussed is ‘Content is king’. Even the search engines are in on the act, with many of their guides directly mentioning to keep tabs on content, it’s creation and how you have it on your site. What no one has really every asked or wondered in these discussions, seems to be the why part of the equation, why is content so important.
Firstly, content is a rather broad term, it can be text on your site, images, videos, interactive forms, almost anything you can place on your site to engage visitors is deemed as content. Once you have your content on your site, it’s up to either yourself, or your visitors to spread it around the web. Some of the faster ways you can do that for yourself would be via a Twitter or Facebook feed, obviously one with your clients as followers. The idea is that your followers link to your content, and help spread the word that you’re the leading authority in widget and doohicky sales in town.
This is where your content has started to generate back links to your website, and where your authority can be proven in your niche market. This you could call the third step of being relevant in the search engines, as the path to this point has been Content -> Followers -> Back links. If you follow the hype that the greener SEOs out there try to sell, it’s that you have no control over who links to your content, and to a degree they are correct. Almost every small business owner out there doesn’t have the hours in the day to devote to creating content, monitoring followers and the policing where there links are coming from. There aren’t really even that many who know how to view their backlinks profile in a search engine.
This is where a small portion of the real search engine optimization work comes into play, online body guards. It is in our best interest to ensure that any single backlink you have coming to your site, is from a reliable and relevant source. Once you create your content and make it available online, it’s in the wild and you really do have no control over who links to it, but we have the time, the expertise, and the steps in place to take care of who links to your site and content. So in the end, a simple four steps as to why content is king could be viewed as follows:
Content -> Followers
Relevance < – Backlinks
With Google making their gaff and releasing their earnings numbers in the middle of the day as opposed to the end of day, it caused a bit of excitement. So much do in fact, that trading on their stock had to be halted, due to their earnings being lower than expected.
The market had already been aggressive with the stock, estimating positive growth in the company. With the final numbers coming in lower than what was expected, it caused the knee jerk reaction that the stock experienced. But just how is it, that one of the most powerful online properties failed to increase earnings when they picked up notable acquisitions like Motorola? Perhaps the answer isn’t as complex as it seems on the surface.
When it comes to search there is a handful of (viable) options for being found online, Google, Bing etc. But one of the avenues that mostly levels the search playing field is paid search, or PPC. Pay per click is almost the gear equalizer, as it’s limited to daily budget and doesn’t have any real bearing on age of domain or rely on heavy back linking strategies, you just need to write a better ad than the other guy. The issue we’ve been seeing in the last 8 months or so is the cost per click on client campaigns, previous costs ran in the 35 to 40 cent range where now we’re seeing increases to the 3 dollar plus range.
It makes it vastly difficult for anyone who doesn’t have a budget of several hundred dollars, equating to budgets of several thousand dollars per month. Short term gains are much more difficult for the mid to small business owner and who knows, maybe a direct correlation was their bottom line.
The myths surrounding SEO are many, everything ranging from what the algorithm contains, how to trick the engines to rank highly with no effort and everything in between. Just like all rumors, they have a beginning, and it seems someone is trying to start a new on on the Webmaster World forums.
A site owner who has ended up being ‘Penguinized’ on his site as he put it, has become overly paranoid about any and all content on his site. He has basically decided, that all user generated content is a potential red flag for spam on his site, and as a result had currently removed/disabled all of the content. The (potential) birth of the SEO myth that user generated content, comments, forums, or other ways to directly interact with your customers, can lead to a Google applying a penalty to your site.
Without any confusion, user generated content will notlead to any penalty to be levied against your site.
It’s topics like this one started on active forums and blogs that lead to a great deal of confusion in the search world. It might seem like an inoccuous discussion taking place in a proper forum by someone looking for information, but with the way the discussion was handled it has the potential to lead to long lasting repurcussions. Because what often ends up happening is someone new to the search world finds these posts, and begins to believe them and the myth continues, changes, and unfortunately grows.
There’s been a small surge of malware reports coming from the searches via Bing and Google, which really isn’t news in and of itself as they’re always buried within the results somewhere. But what is different, is that more than 90% of image results were found to be malware related on some terms.
The most targeted term this time around happens to be “Emma Watson”, whom McAfee has named their most dangerous celebrity search of 2012. Of the two engines, 30% of Googles searches had malware warnings attached and more than double that came out of Bings results. Malware take overs happen in a couple of different ways, one of the most frequent are websites built with little to no security written in, and then there are throw away websites and urls used purely for the spread of malware on the web.
Black hat SEOs typically go after the hottest search terms and poke around the web looking for websites which have loop holes in it’s security. They actively work to hijack the website and it’s url, to help lend false authority to what ever term they’re wanting to spam. And because uneducated or hasty users tend to automatically trust the top results in the search engines, the spread of malware will continue.
Because of the recent discoveries that image results are getting slammed with malicious results, where the text results pages are beginning to be left behind, Bing has been unofficially dubbed (currently) the most poisonous search engine. The only reason that the moniker has been attached to the search service is due to the recent report about malicious websites being targeted at image searches now as opposed to the text results pages. Not to fret however, as Bing and Google will take steps to close those holes which have been opened in the image results, and in the meantime just be a little more cautious before clicking that top image of your favorite star.
Came across this great infographic by Aaron Wall at SEOBook, what I found most interesting was the deluded people mentioned, here at Fresh Traffic we have been coming across people like this from day one of the internet. The truth of the matter is that most people who say or mention this are on the list, why? simple they cannot do it.
Click to enlarge to pdf version
Previously I mentioned how Zuckerberg was being tapped for information about a possible Facebook search engine, and while he admitted to serving something on the order of a billion searches per day, he wouldn’t admit to there being an engine on the way. It seems this week, that there is still a smattering of discussion still trying to discerne if there is a social search engine on the horizon.
There is a strong belief in the social circle, that the search industry is headed towards a results page which is served based on your friends list. There has been the odd study every few months which seem about as skewed as the recent BingItOn (citing 2:1 Bing over Google acceptance) challenge which are overwhelmingly in favor of a social engine as opposed to a search engine. It’s only my personal opinion, but I think Google and Bing are already headed in the right direciton, with having some social signals being included into the organic and paid results. If someone were to build an engine served entirely by social signals, the only one in the space who could feasibly pull it off would obviously be Facebook, however their reasons for being tight lipped about the possibility of one launching is likely due to the studies being not entirely as accurate as the media would have you believe. As always, time will tell, and change is a very good thing.
Jabber, Jabber, Jabber
There is always a positive side, and a negative side to having someone else complete work for you. On the positive, you are paying a professional to complete a job at a much higher skill level than you could. A negative however, stems from the fact that you are time constrained suddenly, not by your own, but by the professional you have hired.
There is no real way to speed up the process of properly completing a project once you have turned it over to someone else. Just like you bring a car to a mechanic to fix your engine, you bring it to an autobody business to have it repainted. You wouldn’t ask a mechanic to paint it, it’s not their job nor are they proficient at it. In the same line of thinking, when it’s required for your SEO to work through your tech department, mandatory steps can end up taking a day or two, and (we have had ths happen) sometimes up to two weeks. This is an immense amount of time to lose on any campaign, whether it’s a single day or 10 days, it’s time lost in search. It’s akin to bringing your car in for a paint job, but having all of the instructions relayed through the mechanic, to the autobody technician.
Communication is an incredibly important step in the optimization process, and it works in all directions. Just as it’s important for a client to relay desired keyword position, it’s important that as SEO professionals we regularly communicate with you to keep you apprised of how you are performing. When the communication stops, that’s when the problems begin.
Organic search engine optimization is the bigger puzzle to Adwords. It’s a tougher to work with, there’s no way to buy your way to the top, and when you’re competing against (possibly) millions of local web pages it can be a tough nut to crack. It’s these more difficult steps which are some of the larger deciding factors as to the cost of any given SEO campaign, and yet it seems to be the largest point of contention when contract discussions come up.
Late last year there was a brief survey conducted about the costs of SEO, and contrary to what some may believe, here at Fresh we’re right on target. For example, we’re working on going on year 6 here in Winnipeg, and while (according to the information gathered) that puts us on the downward slope of those surveyed, it really does show that there was a boom in the industry on a whole. We’re not shy in saying that ever since Jerry arrived and began working his online magic that all of a sudden there were 40-50 SEO “experts” within a year, where as previous there were no players.
We also like to work closely with our clients, as do most of those who were surveyed, and we all enjoy working hands on with the SEO changes after conducting some proper keyword research. Link building is also in our repetoire, as is content suggestions, however we like to shy away from directly creating your content for you, as no one knows your business like you do. As for what just that fraction of our expertise costs you as a client? If you head down to section 9 of the survey results, you’ll find the monthly retainer fees of those surveyed. If you’re an existing client of ours, you’ll know exactly where you stand, and if you’re not, then what are you waiting for? Here you have before you a representation of the projected costs of retaining a true expert in the field of SEO and online branding, you should think of your existing marketing expenses, compare them to the average of the surveyed results. Factor in that organic SEO is the highest return on investment in marketing available and make the (right) decision, we’ll wait.
There’s been a couple of Google updates in the last week, which has had a visible change on the results pages. One of the updates was fairly simply, it was a Panda update which according to the available information impacted less than 1% of searches. And the other update was in how the results page returns your search results.
The Panda update was another in a long string of updates designed to improve the overall search quality, and with the change affecting such a small sample if you’re following the rules then you shouldn’t perceive any issue. If you’re the numbers type of person, you can compare the less than 1% affected from this last update, to the 12% affected when Panda made it’s initial break out onto the web. One of the points to bear in mind as well with this news coming straight from Google, there may be some surprises in store under the hood of this latest update.
Maybe the extra they put into the Panda update has something to do with the tweet from Matt Cutts earlier this week?
Just fyi, we rolled out a small algo change this week that improves the diversity of search results in terms of different domains returned.
Diversity in the search results is a great growing point, as it gives more opportunity for optimization to show it’s mettle. It’s possible, to have an entire first page of results completely dominated by a single website, if your optimization is that strong and your competitors are that weak. While the change was added only this week, reports are that it hasn’t yet been noticed in the bulk of the results.
And it’s a bit of a throwback to the beginnings of the web, but according to a recent posting, the keywords tag has returned. According to Google News Product Manager Rudy Galfi:
The goal is simple: empower news writers to express their stories freely while helping Google News to properly understand and classify that content so that it’s discoverable by our wide audience of users.
Similar in spirit to the plain keywords metatag, the news_keywords metatag lets publishers specify a collection of terms that apply to a news article. These words don’t need to appear anywhere within the headline or body text.
A small difference in the way the news_keywords tag works, is you’re limited to 10 terms, likely to stop users from cramming as many terms as they like. It’s a new way to use an old tag, and it’s going to be interesting to see how the use plays out.
It’s crunch time for budgets, we’re coming to a point where you need to decide: do we spend more and hope for big returns over the holidays? Or do we cut back and hope we can carry through to a new year? It’s not a question anyone can really answer for you, as everyones situation is unique, I would however, like to make a case for our niche – online branding, or internet marketing if you prefer.
Where online is concerned, consistency matters most, in your content, your presentation of yourself, of how you manage your online image and branding. And while it’s true for almost all facets of life, it’s even more apparent where your online spending is concerned; you get what you pay for. If you pay for shoddy service and workmanship, that’s exactly what you’ll receive. Where online and the search engines are concerned though, you will likely end up being penalized, and at worst, banned from the results pages until you clean up your site and links. Now some people try and sell that organic optimization only takes a one time shot and is a very low cost to work ratio, when in fact it’s pretty much the exact opposite that’s true.
As an example, if you try and save some money where your online marketing is concerned and decide to out source to one of the cheap advertisers out there, odds are very high that you’re going to end up with poor, if not irrelevant back links, and this will get your site snagged up in the newest algorithm addition – Penguin. The addition of Penguin into the algorithm means that the link spammers of the past, are very quickly finding themselves with burned urls – aka websites which have become useless to link to, or with. It takes a great deal of time to work out a relevant, and acceptable linking strategy for any companies website, and to skimp on this portion of your marketing will be one of the nails in your websites coffin.
Often times when you’re having your website built for you, or if you’re having it redesigned, you’ll find that web developers can run into the hundreds and thousands of dollars. If you have a complex site, with a shopping cart, perhaps streaming videos and audio with a user login system, you’ll be possibly even looking into the tens of thousands in cost. Thinking about saving money on your website and it’s construction? Rethink that cost saving measure, as cutting costs from the way your site functions, looks and performs can not only get you flagged by the search engines as having errors, but it can leave your site poorly secured and the possibility of being hijacked increases greatly. And if your website becomes hijacked by a malicious user who uses it to spam (best case scenario), or completely trash your website and use it to spread malware (black listed from the SERPs) not only will the search engines not trust you, your end users and customers will begin to distrust as well.
This was only two, of the plethora of issues which can sink your website should you choose to skimp on your online budget, and while being removed from the SERPs is a terrible possibility, the interaction lost with your current and possible customers should be seen as the real loss. Lost traffic due to reduced resources leads to lost conversion rates over all, which is just a never ending cycle of less and less.
Previousl I wrote about a Google patent which has gained more and more traction in the search community. The patent in question is named Ranking documents, and as mentioned previously it seemed like an interesting tactic to employ to catch thsoe who less than ideal tactics to rank a website.
Unfortunately, often times you’ll find that people are discussing search engine optimization, and will tack on the terms spamming, or buying links, but the truth of it is – when you do it right SEO is none of those things. The new patent that was discovered I think of like a magic trick, it’s a bit of slight of hand that Google is using to get those unscrupulous tacticians to reveal themselves. Google shows them the index, they try and spam to get ranked highly. When Google notices the spam, they show a different set of results (if you don’t think they can do that, you’re not thinking clearly) just to see the reaction of their target. If they continue to offend, their site will likely be penalized, and the ranking pages will haven’t been affected negatively.
Spamming links to a website to give uncredible weight to a term is a measure used by those in the industry who are in the game for only a few quick clicks. Often used on disposable website urls, they will target a hot, trending term – as an example Paul Ryan’s RNC speech – and will try and garner as many links and as much visibility as possible in as short a time frame as they can. It’s a pump and dump tactic that is very likely to have the offending site banned from the index and the url blacklisted.
I fore see that this patent will be dissected, discussed, scrutinized and blamed for all manner of SEO problems and head aches to come. The only problem that some site owners have has with Google, Bing and Yahoo is they’re getting better and better at catching the people who try to cut corners or use less than natural methods to rank their site. Maybe even one day soon, we’ll have an adaptive algorithm which detects, and removes spam sites as you search actively so black hatters go the way of the dodo bird.